Showing posts with label News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Garbage (a.k.a. "Fake") News

Snapshot from a garbage fake new site:
http://usa-conservative.com
What you see is a fake news site. No sources, just a post that spews outright lies.

And yet, this garbage gets passed around as "fact."

You may think that this particular post isn't that big of a deal - but considering that this is supposed to be a "conservative site". 

I've been through this before, but maybe I wasn't clear. So here are steps you can take to make sure you aren't spreading lies.

DO: Check to see if there are sources.

If fake news sites actually link to anything, it's usually to another site that it plagiarized. Usually, however, there are no links.

DON'T: Link to the page based on its title. Read the article first.

DO: Use Google. Just type the title into the search box. If you can't find anything to your satisfaction, then pick up some keywords. "Monica Lewinski Died" would be a good search parameter to use.

DON'T: Post something without doing your research. Don't have time to research? Then don't post it.

---

Now to get all religious (a heads up to non-Christians)

As Christians, we are supposed to Purveyors of truth. If you are not posting something that isn't true, then you are spreading a lie. Guess who the father of all lies is? Guess who you are helping by sharing lies?

Now, more than ever, we are up for scrutiny. Don't give those who hate us more fodder. They already have enough as it is.


Thursday, May 4, 2017

How to spot Real Fake News

In spite of all of the "safeguards" that Facebook had, someone linked to an "article" (which looked more like a blog) that set off a lot of alarm bells. The only source that it claimed to give was a video that was vaguely related to the article but had nothing to do with the article itself.

A quick search of the details given in the article, the place, the business that was mentioned and I only found links to other "news" sites that have the exact same story. None of them have any sources and it appears they were all copy-pasted from another site that no longer exists. I could not find the business in question or any local news source that had a similar story.

Unfortunately, I can't find the link anymore as the site seemed to have disappeared from the internet. So I can't link to it. However, the story is still on Snopes and labeled as False

I know that known legitimate sites have altered the news to fit whatever narrative that they are trying to portray (I'm looking at you CNN) or sensationalized a rare incident to get people spun up (just about every news outlet out there).

However, "fake news" gets posted on Facebook, still. When Facebook flags it as fake news, people got spun up and accused of Facebook mitigating free speech even though after my research, the article is indeed as fake.

This is nothing new. I don't know how many times I've had to explain that "No, your profile can't be hacked just by going to someone else's profile or friending them", "No, Bill gates will not give a dollar to some charity if you share this image", and "No, you are not going to hell if you don't post Obi-Wan Jesus  or any form of Jesus on your wall."

I have not found the verses in the Bible to collaborate that last one.

The recent "Breaking News" articles are the most annoying. They are fairly recent and sound very plausible, even to a seasoned internet user like me. So how do we tell the difference? Here are some steps you should take (regardless of the source) before posting some sensational piece that turns out later to be misleading if not completely false.

  1. Move your mouse to the link and actually click on it. Don't just assume the article is valid because it has thousands of shares and likes.
  2. Check for sources. A lot of these articles either are a copy-paste from another news site, which is a copy paste from yet another site, which is a copy paste from a known satire news source. Some of these articles do not show any sources at all or link to something that isn't even related to the site.
  3. Google the details. If the article doesn't have a whole lot of details, then check Snopes. Yes, it's supposedly biased to the left, although I have found a lot of left fake news debunked by Snopes. Even if you feel that way, Snopes usually gives more details and sources that you can use to do your own research. When I find a better fact-checking site, then I'll post a blog on that.
  4. If in doubt,  don't post it. You do not have to be a pawn in anyone's game. The fake news posts and heavily edited "legit news" are designed to get you spun up and to perpetuate a narrative that they want to "win". Take a deep breath. You are better than that. Skip it until you have more information.

In order for real change to come, we all need to be informed with real facts. This can't happen until a large percentage of people decide that they will no longer be manipulated like this. In the meantime, do your research and if you find an article that is inaccurate, do your research then say something and post the facts.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

YouTube drama continues



Above: Seriously Strange by Rob Dyke. This show is reminiscent of "Unsolved Mysteries" and not as gory as "Rescue 911" - and yet, advertisers in a more "conservative" time were happy to have their brands next to those shows.

Don't get me started on Adult Swim and the News.

Rob decided to do some daily shows that are - well, less elaborate and more vulgar besides his professionally done weekly shows. I think this is his not-so-subtle ways of giving the boycott the virtual middle finger - he's very close to making his financial goal, without ad revenue.

Keep in mind, Rob pays people to work on his videos (not sure about the dailies). This means if he quits, however many people he employs will be jobless. The boycott can potentially kill jobs.

Proud of yourself companies that are boycotting YouTube?

What companies don't understand is that not only the best of YouTubers will find other ways to make money and still go on. Even if it means moving to other video platforms. They are not going to kill free speech in a free market. It's going to go on and the only harm that they do is to themselves.

Speaking of which, they also don't seem to understand that a boycott can go both ways.

Boycott companies “Boycotting” YouTube’s advertisement program

Perhaps it's time to show companies who funds them?

To be fair to Google, they are kind of stuck in the middle. The people running Google are not stupid. They know that most of the content creators will find other ways to fund them. They also know that by restricting ads in this manner can actually do more harm to companies who want their ads to be seen by as many people as possible.

A boycott on YouTube is not going to let that happen.

Again, I say don't leave YouTube. Find other ways to make money. Then perhaps (as best you can, some are unavoidable), avoid the brands that have boycotted YouTube. Time for a brand restricted diet.

----

This time, it is the last one about the YouTube boycott. I have a few new blogs planned, including "Grammerly" which I will get into in my next post.

If you like what you see, share this post. If you really like what you see, consider a small donation or purchasing from the MOMETEK Cafepress store.